planetf1.com

It is currently Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:18 am

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please read the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:41 pm
Posts: 422
I can see Mercedes taking risks this weekend if the Ferrari and Renault upgrades present tangible lap time improvements.

If its the last race the engine has to do - could we see if whacked up to 11?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
M44 wrote:
I can see Mercedes taking risks this weekend if the Ferrari and Renault upgrades present tangible lap time improvements.

If its the last race the engine has to do - could we see if whacked up to 11?

I think that might present more risk than reward. Turning up an engine that's already at the end of its life may increase the chance of a DNF for one or both cars. They'd probably settle for a podium, or even just behind, rather than no points at all. And don't forget Ricciardo is due to be hit with some hefty grid penalties, which may remove him from contention

There again, there's a reason I'm not a paid F1 strategist...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:13 am 
Zoue wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.

I red another report which said it was 27bhp, but even that was speculation and I can't find anything from Honda themselves

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-canadian-gp-engine-upgrade-ice-1044804/

Either are a massive jump if true, hope it isn't a self detonation upgrade though...

Still think McLaren would have been better long term with Honda than Renault!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
dompclarke wrote:
Zoue wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.

I red another report which said it was 27bhp, but even that was speculation and I can't find anything from Honda themselves

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-canadian-gp-engine-upgrade-ice-1044804/

Either are a massive jump if true, hope it isn't a self detonation upgrade though...

Still think McLaren would have been better long term with Honda than Renault!

yeah I'll be gutted for them if Honda finally come good this year, after putting McLaren through the wringer for the last three. It would be a cruel twist of fate to lose being a Works team just when everything came together


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 2:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 7:55 pm
Posts: 6977
Zoue wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
Zoue wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.

I red another report which said it was 27bhp, but even that was speculation and I can't find anything from Honda themselves

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-canadian-gp-engine-upgrade-ice-1044804/

Either are a massive jump if true, hope it isn't a self detonation upgrade though...

Still think McLaren would have been better long term with Honda than Renault!

yeah I'll be gutted for them if Honda finally come good this year, after putting McLaren through the wringer for the last three. It would be a cruel twist of fate to lose being a Works team just when everything came together

Who put who through the ringer?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
sandman1347 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
Zoue wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.

I red another report which said it was 27bhp, but even that was speculation and I can't find anything from Honda themselves

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-canadian-gp-engine-upgrade-ice-1044804/

Either are a massive jump if true, hope it isn't a self detonation upgrade though...

Still think McLaren would have been better long term with Honda than Renault!

yeah I'll be gutted for them if Honda finally come good this year, after putting McLaren through the wringer for the last three. It would be a cruel twist of fate to lose being a Works team just when everything came together

Who put who through the ringer?
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:42 am
Posts: 1032
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
sandman1347 wrote:
Zoue wrote:
dompclarke wrote:
Zoue wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.

I red another report which said it was 27bhp, but even that was speculation and I can't find anything from Honda themselves

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-canadian-gp-engine-upgrade-ice-1044804/

Either are a massive jump if true, hope it isn't a self detonation upgrade though...

Still think McLaren would have been better long term with Honda than Renault!

yeah I'll be gutted for them if Honda finally come good this year, after putting McLaren through the wringer for the last three. It would be a cruel twist of fate to lose being a Works team just when everything came together

Who put who through the ringer?


I'd say that Honda put McLaren through the wringer regarding performance, which made it very difficult for McLaren to adequately estimate their own performance over time - but it wasn't just a one-way street and the working relationship appeared to be very poor. Honda ended up becoming a virtual meme over the course of that relationship. :uhoh: :uhoh:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 5247
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis


2016 they had no lean burn and a too small a turbo although it was reliable for the second half of the year at least and it wasn't until Monza 2017 that they had full deployment through their extra harvest technique and the lean burn was working properly so it was more the last third last year.

Since then it's been a proper F1 engine but still a little behind going into Canada but with Renault shelving part of their upgrade and Honda bringing a good one it could change this weekend though.

_________________
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:33 pm
Posts: 2607
So I expect Ferrari to have slightly more power this weekend. Curious that a quality issue was spotted for the upgraded Merc PUs, but at least it was spotted in time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33757
M44 wrote:
I can see Mercedes taking risks this weekend if the Ferrari and Renault upgrades present tangible lap time improvements.

If its the last race the engine has to do - could we see if whacked up to 11?

That would be exactly the opposite thing that they would be doing.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 7:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:13 pm
Posts: 16684
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis


It was awful. It just wasn't as awful as previous efforts. How can it be "midfield on par with the chassis"? It was clearly still the worst engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 1493
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.


I did actually mean advantage Ferrari from the point of view that Merc will have a PU that has done six races and Ferrari one is new, without considering any potential upgrade for Ferrari. It's something Hamilton is worried about by the sounds of things. Bottas said today the engine was planned to be used again in Hungary which would have been less of a disadvantage than using it here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 8:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:38 pm
Posts: 2567
Max is getting tired of the questions.. Awkward moment..

https://youtu.be/PcDtCqvNIQU?t=276

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 4:11 pm
Posts: 2000
JN23 wrote:
Llotyhy wrote:
It's not just the new spec power unit for Ferrari. It's also the fact that Merc will be using the power unit that has been in the car since March. Ferrari's pu will be comfortably better this weekend.

Also very interested to see what Honda will bring. 40hp would be huge.


I did actually mean advantage Ferrari from the point of view that Merc will have a PU that has done six races and Ferrari one is new, without considering any potential upgrade for Ferrari. It's something Hamilton is worried about by the sounds of things. Bottas said today the engine was planned to be used again in Hungary which would have been less of a disadvantage than using it here.


Should be an easy win for Ferrari and Vettel this weekend. Merc don't stand a chance with an old engine that has no upgrade. Another damage limitation weekend for Hamilton.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33757
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33757
Mr-E wrote:
Max is getting tired of the questions.. Awkward moment..

https://youtu.be/PcDtCqvNIQU?t=276

He seemed to leave in a hurry as well.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33757
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development

The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:42 pm
Posts: 2199
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development

The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?


It was certainly a significant factor in that. Not everything has to be black and white.

_________________
Top Three Team Champions 2017 (With Jezza13)
Group Pick 'Em Champion: 2016 & 2019


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 11:13 am
Posts: 1998
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development


So we are just going to pretend that Mclaren using the same engine as redbull now and still look no better than Force India was all Honda.

Considering everyone can tell Redbull is being held back by Renault.

Mclaren was and still is awful fooling people with we have the best chassis only the PU is hoolding us back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 12:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:14 pm
Posts: 3876
Rockie wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development


So we are just going to pretend that Mclaren using the same engine as redbull now and still look no better than Force India was all Honda.

Considering everyone can tell Redbull is being held back by Renault.

Mclaren was and still is awful fooling people with we have the best chassis only the PU is hoolding us back.


Yeah I don't understand why some people still can't accept that fact. Mclaren most likely never had a good chassis. You could spin it however you want and say that this year is not last year blah blah blah... It doesn't work. The current chassis is miles off the best on the grid, and it's obvious that the Honda cars weren't that good either and not just because of Honda.
Seriously, they need to restructure their whole team. Personally, I may sound harsh, but I think the drivers, Bouiller, Promodou, to name a few, should all be replaced. It is just not working. Just blow up the whole thing and start over with fresh blood.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:02 am
Posts: 1052
Location: India
Lotus49 wrote:
Covalent wrote:
About those stats... how can traction be a 5 while asphalt grip is 1?


I assume it's two different things being measured like traction being more of a track description of what is important here while asphalt grip is just measuring asphalt grip if you see what I mean.

Slow corners and straights so it's a high traction dependent circuit (5)
Low asphalt grip (1)

I dunno if I'm explaining myself very well here but it's why McLaren are expecting a nightmare,great mechanical grip and straightline speed are key here and they have neither.

STR will pummel them here if Bahrain was any indicator.



No way this is happening. I think they have done great job so far but surely Mclaren should stretch their advantage going into season though it will funny if Honda before the end of the year can overtake Renault lol Renault is still giving them 0.1-0.2sec lap advantage per lap I think and Alonso adding another 0.1-0.2sec. Probably in qualifying the difference is less. My guess is Haas with it upgrades will be 4th best team here. Renault, Mclaren, FI should fight for Q3. Williams was also good in Baku :?

_________________
Sir Stirling Moss "Quite frankly, Kimi Raikkonen is the fastest driver in the world"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 5247
Rockie wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development


So we are just going to pretend that Mclaren using the same engine as redbull now and still look no better than Force India was all Honda.

Considering everyone can tell Redbull is being held back by Renault.

Mclaren was and still is awful fooling people with we have the best chassis only the PU is hoolding us back.


Are we just going to pretend the Honda engine in the back of the STR is the same Honda engine McLaren had for 3 seasons? Post Monza last year is the best Honda did with McLaren and this one has 20kw on it and is more reliable.

McLaren said they lacked to the top chassis's more often than they said otherwise but this is ignored. Generally the people sticking up for the chassis said it was 4th best, 3rd at most in the second half of 2016 which is when James Allen also wrote about it being thought of as 3rd by rival engineers, but this is ignored while people pretend there was a group of people calling it the best.

They changed nose concept, rear suspension and engine change all in one winter, they don't have access to the full chassis dyno, they had their suspension trick taken away from them and they are self admittedly 2 months behind schedule and yet where are they fighting for right now, yep 4th.

It's bad enough people acting like the STR has a 2015 Honda engine in it without people assuming that a poor and behind schedule car in one year means every car that came before it, even the ones before in an entirely different regulation set, were also poor.

It's like no-one remembers Red Bull's start to last year when they were over a second behind because of a correlation issue. I assume that meant the 2015/16 and this years car must be also poor too I suppose because chassis don't fluctuate and upgrades and concept changes and rule tweaks don't exist of course.

_________________
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 5247
Mercedes-Benz wrote:
Lotus49 wrote:
Covalent wrote:
About those stats... how can traction be a 5 while asphalt grip is 1?


I assume it's two different things being measured like traction being more of a track description of what is important here while asphalt grip is just measuring asphalt grip if you see what I mean.

Slow corners and straights so it's a high traction dependent circuit (5)
Low asphalt grip (1)

I dunno if I'm explaining myself very well here but it's why McLaren are expecting a nightmare,great mechanical grip and straightline speed are key here and they have neither.

STR will pummel them here if Bahrain was any indicator.



No way this is happening. I think they have done great job so far but surely Mclaren should stretch their advantage going into season though it will funny if Honda before the end of the year can overtake Renault lol Renault is still giving them 0.1-0.2sec lap advantage per lap I think and Alonso adding another 0.1-0.2sec. Probably in qualifying the difference is less. My guess is Haas with it upgrades will be 4th best team here. Renault, Mclaren, FI should fight for Q3. Williams was also good in Baku :?


They were so good in Bahrain though, their low d/f package worked well, they had great traction out of the corners and good top end grunt whereas McLaren are the opposite right now, their new rear suspension is rubbish, low speed corners are a nightmare, mechanical grip looks poor, in S3 Spain and Monaco they were further away than what they were to the top teams in the higher speed corner sectors like 1 in Mon and 1+2 in Spain.

They've got drag issues and poor traction and Alonso's praying for rain, that's never a good sign. Meanwhile STR have got a chassis upgrade and engine upgrade coming and they were mighty on the last point and squirt circuit so I honestly think they'll do them over big time here again, like Bahrain basically. Hass could be a threat to them though yeah, they get the Ferrari update I think.

McLaren's issues aren't going to be addressed until Silverstone apparently but I'm not sure if that's drag related or mechanical grip. They also look a bit bare in the bargeboards still compared to the top guys as well.

_________________
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:36 pm
Posts: 5247
Typical, just saw this from Alonso who seems much more upbeat all of a sudden...(From Marca)

"On paper maybe this is not an ideal circuit for us, but at the same time, with the improvement of the engine and with some new aerodynamic piece that we will premiere, we improve on track according to the simulations, I think it could be a good weekend"

So maybe you'll be right M-B, I was unaware they had chassis upgrades coming so maybe that'll help, who knows.

_________________
"Clark came through at the end of the first lap so far ahead that we in the pits were convinced that the rest of the field must have been wiped out in an accident."
-Eddie Dennis, describing the dominance of Jim Clark in the Lotus 49 at Spa 1967


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 8281
Location: Mumbai, India
Ricciardo will be avoiding a grid penalty as Red Bull will be swapping the MGU-K which was used in China.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/headlines/2018/6/ricciardo-set-to-avoid-grid-penalty-in-canada.html

_________________
Feel The Fourth


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
Lotus49 wrote:
Rockie wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:

2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development


So we are just going to pretend that Mclaren using the same engine as redbull now and still look no better than Force India was all Honda.

Considering everyone can tell Redbull is being held back by Renault.

Mclaren was and still is awful fooling people with we have the best chassis only the PU is hoolding us back.


Are we just going to pretend the Honda engine in the back of the STR is the same Honda engine McLaren had for 3 seasons? Post Monza last year is the best Honda did with McLaren and this one has 20kw on it and is more reliable.

McLaren said they lacked to the top chassis's more often than they said otherwise but this is ignored. Generally the people sticking up for the chassis said it was 4th best, 3rd at most in the second half of 2016 which is when James Allen also wrote about it being thought of as 3rd by rival engineers, but this is ignored while people pretend there was a group of people calling it the best.

They changed nose concept, rear suspension and engine change all in one winter, they don't have access to the full chassis dyno, they had their suspension trick taken away from them and they are self admittedly 2 months behind schedule and yet where are they fighting for right now, yep 4th.

It's bad enough people acting like the STR has a 2015 Honda engine in it without people assuming that a poor and behind schedule car in one year means every car that came before it, even the ones before in an entirely different regulation set, were also poor.

It's like no-one remembers Red Bull's start to last year when they were over a second behind because of a correlation issue. I assume that meant the 2015/16 and this years car must be also poor too I suppose because chassis don't fluctuate and upgrades and concept changes and rule tweaks don't exist of course.

:thumbup: :thumbup:

Not much to add to that!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 3:53 am
Posts: 7630
Location: Michigan, USA
Lotus49 wrote:
It's like no-one remembers Red Bull's start to last year when they were over a second behind because of a correlation issue. I assume that meant the 2015/16 and this years car must be also poor too I suppose because chassis don't fluctuate and upgrades and concept changes and rule tweaks don't exist of course.

The 2015 car wasn't good, but that just proves your point. Was anyone pointing at the 2015 RBR and calling it proof that the 2014 chassis wasn't a match for Mercedes? No.

_________________
PICK 10 COMPETITION (4 wins, 15 podiums): 3rd in 2016
TOP THREE CHAMPIONSHIP (No Limit Excedrin Racing): Champions in 2015 & 2018 | 2nd in 2017 & 2019
AUTOSPORT GP PREDICTOR: 2017 USA & P-F1 Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 6:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
Zoue wrote:
the Honda PU was a disaster for three years. Whatever other problems either party had with each other, that should be beyond dispute


2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development

The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?

There's a simple point being made here, which seems to be escaping you and some others. And that's that the Honda PU has been terrible for the last three years - irrespective of any other issues the team may have had - and it would be frustrating for McLaren if, after having had to endure that for three years, Honda finally looked to be getting it right after they divorced and lost Works status. In other words, McLaren would have become Red Bull's development team, which would undoubtedly be frustrating for them.

That's it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 8281
Location: Mumbai, India
Power unit components used upto now:

Image
Source - www.imgur.com

_________________
Feel The Fourth


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:20 am
Posts: 1345
Why are so many Ferrari teams on the 2nd components already? I know Kimi's was a failure, but were the others planned given that the 5 out of 6 of Ferrari powered drivers are on component 2 with the exception being Vettel.

Looking at that table it seems like Mercedes engines are the only ones on schedule to use 3 engines. I always thought it was better to use 4 anyway. The top 3 teams can Just use the 4th engine in a late season race when you look to be finishing 4th-6th anyway, start from the back and finish 5th-7th.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 8281
Location: Mumbai, India
The weather during the weekend promises to be good & sunny. There might be some showers during Friday evening but other than that the weekend is poised to be dry & good weather will be all around.
https://www.racefans.net/2018/06/08/2018-canadian-grand-prix-weather/

_________________
Feel The Fourth


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 990
That Merc engine still looks mighty strong


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 8281
Location: Mumbai, India
A gorgeous overview of this magnificent track. Looks like as if hardly any thinking went into forming the layout:

Image
Source - www.imgur.com

_________________
Feel The Fourth


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 10:39 am
Posts: 25158
So it seems only Vettel is getting the upgraded Ferrari engine in Canada, since Kimi's earlier engine failure meant he's out of sync with the program. That's the ICE - Kimi is getting a new turbo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm
Posts: 3508
AnRs wrote:
That Merc engine still looks mighty strong


How can you tell that already?

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:52 pm
Posts: 3508
Zoue wrote:
So it seems only Vettel is getting the upgraded Ferrari engine in Canada, since Kimi's earlier engine failure meant he's out of sync with the program. That's the ICE - Kimi is getting a new turbo


Not really worth it for an extra 5hp.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2016: 24th place
2017: 4th place
2018: 12th place

Wins: Spain 2016, Canada 2017, Malaysia 2017
Podiums: 2nd Germany 2016, 3rd Mexico 2016, 3rd China 2018, 3rd Japan 2018, 2nd Mexico 2018


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:14 am
Posts: 1493
Bad start for Hulk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
Posts: 33757
Herb wrote:
pokerman wrote:
Zoue wrote:
pokerman wrote:
AravJ wrote:
2016 and mid 2017 Honda was not too bad though about midfield on par with the chasis

Yes it was very convenient for McLaren to put 100% of the blame onto the Honda engine.

Even Honda admitted their PU was poor. Let's not rewrite history to pretend otherwise.

The point was simply that after having to endure a sub-standard PU for three years, it would be a bit of a kick in the teeth for McLaren if Honda started to come good just after they finally walked away, handing a rival all the fruits of their three years of development

The Honda PU was preventing McLaren from being a top team?


It was certainly a significant factor in that. Not everything has to be black and white.

Indeed but I can't look past the 100% fault put on Honda by McLaren for not winning races.

_________________
PF1 Pick 10 Competition

2013: 5th Place
2014: Champion
2015: 3rd Place
2016: 4th Place

2017: 9th Place
2018: 7th place

Wins: Canada 2018, Abu Dhabi 2017
Podiums: (8)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wolfticket and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group